I need a workflow that helps our team review choices before launching compute-intensive media generations.

Provide a structured pre-generation review workflow that lets teams confirm key settings and decisions before triggering compute-intensive media generation jobs. This reduces wasted compute, avoids preventable mistakes, and improves alignment on outputs before large runs begin.

This feature introduces a pre-launch review workflow for compute-intensive media generation tasks so teams can validate decisions before spending significant resources. It centralizes the key choices that affect cost, quality, and timing—such as parameters, scope, and intended outputs—into a review step. Team members can use the workflow to confirm that the selected options match the project goals and that the generation request is ready to run. The workflow supports more consistent decision-making by prompting reviewers to verify inputs and assumptions before execution. By catching misconfigurations early, it helps reduce reruns and avoidable compute spend. It also improves team coordination by ensuring that stakeholders have a chance to review and align prior to launch. The workflow is useful for both routine production generation and higher-stakes runs where errors are expensive. It can be used to standardize how requests are checked across teams, especially when multiple people contribute to a generation setup. Overall, it increases confidence that compute-heavy jobs start with the right choices and clear team agreement.